I’m convinced my post office belongs in Mayberry.
The post office is right across the street from where I live, which is convenient for mailing stuff, picking up packages or buying stamps (I’ve done two of the above three things so far in my two weeks of living here). Every time I’ve gone into the post office, the workers are chatting away with some customer who has a stack of envelopes–a local business-owner or something of the sort, no doubt. Every time, without fail.
“Hey, haven’t seen you in a while!”
“Yeah, I was gone for about two months.”
Or, even more like Mayberry, someone running into someone else.
“Hey, it’s good to see you. What have you been up to?”
“Well…I’m getting a divorce. Still working at the airport, and my daughter’s in college now.”
“How old is she again?”
“She’s 20–my son’s doing well too, I guess the last time you saw him was ten years ago.”
Ten years ago! I listened for a good five minutes to this very overt conversation between acquaitances who apparently didn’t know each other well enough to contact each other in a decade, but knew each other well enough to catch up on each other’s lives. Maybe it’s not like Mayberry, but Mayberry if the town were twice as big such that everyone knew each other but only encountered any one person once per decade.
This evening when I was mailing something, I witnessed conversation after conversation take place one after another between different sets of people. Customer 1 to Customer 2, Customer 1 to the postal worker, Customer 3 to the postal worker, Customer 3 to Customer 4, Customer 3 to another postal worker, the postal worker to Customer 4. Insanely chatty–about everything from McCain’s VP pick to the local hospital to Customer 3’s grinning daughter (in everyone’s defense, she was cute, and when she looked at me and did the quintessential toddler-squeal, I had to grin back). Maybe I’m used to the usually unchatty German way of life, where you only talk to your neighbors and friends. Rarely are conversations struck up at the bakery or grocery store.
In Charleston, I had a rapport with the local mail workers since I saw them so often. But it was far from the Mayberry experience this Alexandria post office offers upon every visit. «»
As a rule, I don’t like Guns N’ Roses (if given a choice, I’d probably prefer roses over guns), but 


Hands on a Hard Body
Published Thursday, August 28, 2008 commentary Leave a CommentTags: competition, contest, documentary, hands, hands on a hard body, humanity, texas, truck
Hands on a Hard Body: The Documentary is a mid-1990s film chronicling the Longview, Texas Hands on a Hard Body competition in which a couple dozen people attempt to win a truck by keeping their hand on it the longest. Shot in 1995, it’s an amazing glimpse of everyday people in a struggle to make their lives a little easier by winning a truck to keep or to sell.
I lived near Shreveport, Louisiana for most of my childhood, a city about sixty miles from where the events in the film take place. The different types of people ring very familiar bells, from the religious Norma and her friend who speaks of prayer chains to the wisened and somewhat mystical Benny who waxes philosophical about the competition. One of my favorite lines from him is, “You either hunt with the big dogs or you get on the porch with the pups.” Though I can’t think of any example from my childhood in Louisiana, Alabama or South Carolina, this character and his homespun wisdom were eerily familiar in tone.
While the contest is clearly a corporate gimmick which benefits everyone, from the Nissan dealership to the sponsors to the radio station which checks in on the competition on-air throughout the course of the few days, the documentary deals with the people in a way that highlights their humanity and draws out the essence of the experience beyond the simple premise of winning a truck. While the contestants seem to emphasize the significance of the contest more than an average viewer might, there’s something to exploring such a concentrated niche of human experience and examining it from all feasible angles. The conclusion of the competition is unimportant by the end, and the actual winning of the truck is anticlimactic, the experience impinged upon by exhaustion and the intensity of the first day and a half. By the end, delirium has set in and the individuals are uninteresting. The desire to win the truck has waned, the vibrance of the initial stages of the competition gone–a classic example of how the journey is more important than the destination, as an epigraph shown in the opening frames of the film states.
It is equal parts bizarre and banal, and yet it’s part of the fabric of our being in some way, showing a chunk of what makes humans tick through this silly competition which meant so much to this handful of people for such a brief time. «»